<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Generation On-Demand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackplasticglasses.com/2009/05/06/generation-on-demand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackplasticglasses.com/2009/05/06/generation-on-demand/</link>
	<description>Musings on Publishing and life in the Digital Age by Evan Schnittman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:15:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.blackplasticglasses.com/2009/05/06/generation-on-demand/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 03:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackplasticglasses.com/?p=173#comment-99</guid>
		<description>Good analysis, though I think issues of reading need separating from issues of access. 

Immersive reading might be slippery to define. Those of us who value long-form prose have always been in the minority throughout history. We just hate to confront that reality for fears of being called elitist. As far as &quot;immersive reading&quot; in digital media goes, everyone should look more towards documentary films than print as a content model though there&#039;s obviously not much of a revenue model there.  Intellectual property constraints will do more to limit creativity or new forms of &quot;writing&quot; in digital media than on reading and distribution. 

I think you&#039;re absolutely right in that the future is about on demand access to material. And that can be in the format of one&#039;s preference (be it digital or print via print-on-demand or even traditional bookstores).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good analysis, though I think issues of reading need separating from issues of access. </p>
<p>Immersive reading might be slippery to define. Those of us who value long-form prose have always been in the minority throughout history. We just hate to confront that reality for fears of being called elitist. As far as &#8220;immersive reading&#8221; in digital media goes, everyone should look more towards documentary films than print as a content model though there&#8217;s obviously not much of a revenue model there.  Intellectual property constraints will do more to limit creativity or new forms of &#8220;writing&#8221; in digital media than on reading and distribution. </p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re absolutely right in that the future is about on demand access to material. And that can be in the format of one&#8217;s preference (be it digital or print via print-on-demand or even traditional bookstores).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Topics about London &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Generation On-Demand</title>
		<link>http://www.blackplasticglasses.com/2009/05/06/generation-on-demand/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Topics about London &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Generation On-Demand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 22:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackplasticglasses.com/?p=173#comment-98</guid>
		<description>[...] Another fellow blogger placed an observative post today on Generation On-DemandHere&#8217;s a quick excerptIf I am meeting a friend at a pub in London and he is late, I can pull &#8230; doing and doing and doing and doing – never at a loss for things to&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Another fellow blogger placed an observative post today on Generation On-DemandHere&#8217;s a quick excerptIf I am meeting a friend at a pub in London and he is late, I can pull &#8230; doing and doing and doing and doing – never at a loss for things to&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeroen</title>
		<link>http://www.blackplasticglasses.com/2009/05/06/generation-on-demand/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeroen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 22:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackplasticglasses.com/?p=173#comment-97</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re asking two things here:
1) The question is whether we can deliver immersive reading in a manner that is relevant to Generation On-Demand.
2) What will we need to do as an industry to make that happen?

You already gave the answer: put it in the &quot;clouds&quot;. This will automatically lead to a &quot;usage fee&quot; instead of a &quot;buying fee&quot;. For the consumer than it is important to know what they&#039;re paying for. Is it a product I&#039;m paying for or is it the usage of the content?  And is the content mine? Can I resell it or lend it to a friend? No, why not? Next to changing the contract structures I think the transition to e-reading involves a lot of communication to the consumer about what is possible and what is not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re asking two things here:<br />
1) The question is whether we can deliver immersive reading in a manner that is relevant to Generation On-Demand.<br />
2) What will we need to do as an industry to make that happen?</p>
<p>You already gave the answer: put it in the &#8220;clouds&#8221;. This will automatically lead to a &#8220;usage fee&#8221; instead of a &#8220;buying fee&#8221;. For the consumer than it is important to know what they&#8217;re paying for. Is it a product I&#8217;m paying for or is it the usage of the content?  And is the content mine? Can I resell it or lend it to a friend? No, why not? Next to changing the contract structures I think the transition to e-reading involves a lot of communication to the consumer about what is possible and what is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

